It doesn’t sound like it to me Jason.
It depends on whether, as I suspect, that 60% is gross profit, or net.
The way to value a business, any business, is to take the net profit, after ALL expenses, including your wages, and to see how that stacks up against what you could earn on that same money elsewhere.
So, for instance, if you can get 4% interest on your money in a Building Society for doing nothing, why would you invest in a business that only gives you 4% return on your money. You wouldn’t of course.
When you take into account the risks involved, the business needs to be earning a multiple of that risk and effort free return. That multiple will vary from trade to trade, depending on many factors, but in this case a multiple of three times would be about right.
Don’t fall into the trap of thinking that you can run the business alongside your existing operation and reduce the overheads. Hopefully you can, but that would be an added value that you are putting into the business, and the rewards for that should therefore be yours. It’s not what the vendor is selling you, so why should he benefit?
I could go on for hours on this subject, but have a think about this point first. If that basic principle stacks up, we can always go into more detail if you need to.
Just one thought though, if someone was to offer me the turnover figure of my business, I would snatch their hand off.