Activity Feed Forums Vinyl Cutter Discussions General Cutter topics Reg marks inside of graphic

  • Reg marks inside of graphic

    Posted by Jon Miller on June 6, 2014 at 4:20 pm

    Hi Gang,

    Hope everyone is well.

    I just wanted to know if it is possible to use reg marks inside of a graphic?
    I have attached a picture to help explain what I mean…
    The dark reg marks are your usual ones that are ‘outside’ of the graphic.
    Is it possible to have reg marks further in (example using the grey reg marks)

    Kind Regards,

    Jon


    Attachments:

    Jon Miller replied 10 years ago 4 Members · 12 Replies
  • 12 Replies
  • Chris Wool

    Member
    June 6, 2014 at 5:59 pm

    Can’t see how you can use the grey ones but you should be able to invert the black ones.
    May I ask why what printer and cutter I recognise the type of shape

  • Iain Sinton

    Member
    June 6, 2014 at 6:56 pm

    Looks like the regi marks we use with our signlab and minaki set up

  • David Hammond

    Member
    June 6, 2014 at 7:13 pm

    Or cutting master/graphtec.

    If CM I don’t think you can use the grey ones, but as Chris says change them to the other type and you should save as few mm.

    Remember to change it on the plotter too

    ^^all above based on my assumption of CM/graphtec

  • Jon Miller

    Member
    June 6, 2014 at 9:16 pm

    ok, thanks guys.

    i have a mimaki and a graphtec but am looking to add a gerber edge so just wanted to see about maximizing print area 🙂

  • Chris Wool

    Member
    June 6, 2014 at 9:28 pm

    Thought that was the problem I have looked hard at that my self and there are some rad panels you won’t fit in the area. They say 300 mm but I used 295 for my workings.
    Where about are you in the country.

  • Jon Miller

    Member
    June 6, 2014 at 9:32 pm

    Cheerz Chris, yes, thought it a bit of a doozy.
    I am in Stamford, Lincs. I am willing to travel though in order to find a solution 😀

    Kind Regards,

    Jon

  • Chris Wool

    Member
    June 7, 2014 at 9:23 am

    raining in cornwall
    so we have the same thoughts i have been chatting to spandex but yet to actually speak to some one with a real working knowlage of the software and machine. perhaps i ask the wrong questions.
    at present we print on rolands and cut and di -cut on a graphtec flat bed but as you are thinking a edge could be handy.

  • Jon Miller

    Member
    June 7, 2014 at 10:38 am

    Yup, not overly cheery outside here too 🙂

    I guess inverting the reg marks would achieve the same thing as the ‘grey’ ones but I think I noticed in the manual that when using that style of reg mark, they need to be completely outside of the artwork..??
    I may be wrong though, not familiar with the cutter yet as have only just got it and haven’t had a fancy separate cutter before 😀

  • Jon Miller

    Member
    June 7, 2014 at 10:50 am

    The cutter I have is the FC8600 which came with cutting master 3. Just noticed the ‘convert rectangle’ option which let me create reg marks inside of the graphic. Not yet tested but will give it a go later.

  • Chris Wool

    Member
    June 7, 2014 at 2:04 pm
    quote :

    they need to be completely outside of the artwork..??

    thats because the head eye will find the graphic not the next mark and fail. but a bit of tape over the area will stop the eye seeing the graphic and continue to find the next mark.
    the graphtec will also give you the option for the distance printed and measured by the plotter v the drawing distance so compensating for the thicker material distance moved.

  • Chris Wool

    Member
    June 8, 2014 at 1:34 pm

    Other thing on my fc7000 you can tell the arms the distance to the marks.
    Advantage is it ignore s any think within 20 mm of the mark except the mark and goes straight to it at higher speed.
    Unfortunately using a roll cutter for mx stuff still has a load of problems which you will have to work out as you go

  • Jon Miller

    Member
    June 8, 2014 at 2:26 pm

    Thanks Chris

Log in to reply.