• Hugh Potter

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 15:14

    looks good from up here!

  • Steve Newell

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 15:21

    Looks good, Well done chris (hot)

  • Chris Lambe

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 15:24

    How come only one image has appeared ???

  • Chris Lambe

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 15:27

    Here’s the other pics


    Attachments:

  • Chris Lambe

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 15:32

    another


    Attachments:

  • Chris Lambe

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 15:36

    last 1


    Attachments:

  • Neil Speirs

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 15:51
    quote Chris Lambe:

    last 1

    Mmmm…. I don’t think your supposed to wrap the reg plate ๐Ÿ™„

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Hugh Potter

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 16:58
    quote Neil Speirs:

    quote Chris Lambe:

    last 1

    Mmmm…. I don’t think your supposed to wrap the reg plate ๐Ÿ™„

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Lol,

    Chris mate,

    you can attach 5x images per post rather than one per post as you have ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Hugh

  • Martin Gray

    Member
    30 April 2009 at 19:09

    Very nice Chris. ๐Ÿ™‚

    What material did you use?

  • Chris Lambe

    Member
    1 May 2009 at 08:14
    quote Martin Gray:

    Very nice Chris. ๐Ÿ™‚

    What material did you use?

    Thanks for the comments chaps…ooops forgot to wrap the wheels lol… we used arlon dpf 6000

  • Chris Lambe

    Member
    6 May 2009 at 10:02
    quote Martin Gray:

    Very nice Chris. ๐Ÿ™‚

    What material did you use?

    Thanks

    Arlon with the bubble free technology

  • Cheryl Smith

    Member
    6 May 2009 at 10:08

    what colour was the car before?
    was it a complete wrap?

  • Chris Lambe

    Member
    6 May 2009 at 10:25
    quote Cheryl Smith:

    what colour was the car before?
    was it a complete wrap?

    Car was silver

  • Jill Marie Welsh

    Member
    6 May 2009 at 10:36

    Technically it is fine.
    Did you do the design?
    One thing you have to be careful is when you reverse the images (like on the back) that the shadows have the same light source.
    I think it would have looked better if these posies looked more random and less symmetrically placed. But that’s just me.
    The font choices are all very thin and hard to read at a distance.
    I would have tightened up the space between the two words in the name.
    And perhaps boldened it up a bit.
    Just my 2ยข.
    ๐Ÿ˜‰
    Love….Jill

  • Chris Lambe

    Member
    6 May 2009 at 10:56
    quote Jillbeans:

    Technically it is fine.
    Did you do the design?
    One thing you have to be careful is when you reverse the images (like on the back) that the shadows have the same light source.
    I think it would have looked better if these posies looked more random and less symmetrically placed. But that’s just me.
    The font choices are all very thin and hard to read at a distance.
    I would have tightened up the space between the two words in the name.
    And perhaps boldened it up a bit.
    Just my 2ยข.
    ๐Ÿ˜‰
    Love….Jill

    Hi Jill i didn’t design the logo the customer supplied that and the lilly images and he also decided the colour scheme and actually sat looking over my shoulder while i layed it all out for him he was a right stickler but you can only do what your customer wants i agree with all the points you have made but some people want what they want ๐Ÿ˜‰

Log in to reply.