Home Forums Sign Making Discussions Graphic Design Help can anyone help with these two layouts please?

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 17:17

    and these are 2 examples that I’m doing for the customer


    Attachments:

  • Jill Marie Welsh

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 17:20

    What a cool old building!
    I like the bottom one Stephen.
    It suits the age of the building more.
    Not to sound like a smartypants, but do you have to have the word TELEPHONE?
    I would like to see the by-line under the phone number put into a red panel.
    Go get ’em!
    Love….Jill

  • Keith Nilsen

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 17:23

    I agree with Jill, the bottom one compliments the age of the building more. Nice work…

  • Lee Harris

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 17:28

    I agree as well. The bottom one is a lot better and in keeping with the building. I like the word Telephone – sorry Jill

    Lee

  • Mark Shipley

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 17:38

    Hi Steve,

    Nice work !!

    I agree the second sign is in keeping with the building.

    If I may suggest that you ‘Initial cap’ the – Sales – Repairs – MOT Testing of Diesel and Petrol, I think that would be less aggressive than all caps, plus it would make the MOT more prominent as you have done in the first sign.

    Look forward to seeing the finished sign.

    Mark

  • Chris Wool

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 18:12

    yep love the bottom one. and as it is the customer should be overjoyed with it.

    i am being very picky here kerning of the ARW and I like jills box idea but not a lot of space left and any way are you sure that wall could stand sutch a masterpiece

    chris

  • signworxs

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 18:19

    Bottom Steve, you know it makes sense. Is that the place next to the railway crossings near Old Leek?

  • Phill Fenton

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 19:53

    I also prefer the bottom one Steve, and the highlighting on the black of the main red lettering is a really nice touch ๐Ÿ˜€

  • Steve Lamb

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 23:08

    Steve

    I would agree with the second option too, in keeping with the building. My opinion on the layout would be that the bottom two lines are two close together (lines overlap), especially as there is alot of space left near the top!
    In fact, does there need to be such an empahsise on the tel no. anyway? Surely the main purpose of this sign is to tell customers what services are available, not how to contact to ask the question!?

  • Andy Gorman

    Member
    9 November 2004 at 23:13

    Yeah, second one. Has a kind of ‘traditional’ garage sign look to it and would suit the building. Also, knowing your manufacturing methods Steve, I can imagine it’ll look a treat when completed.

  • Rod Gray

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 10:34

    “Austin Bedford”, blimey thats going back a bit? ๐Ÿ™‚ Sign seems to have lasted well if it was erected when those commercials where kings of the road.

    When i first looked at the sign and the house it`s on, it reminded me of Scripps garage in “Heartbeat”. Very quaint and very 60`s in style.

    I also like the bottom one better, you seem to have a good feel for those traditional type signs Steve. The jpg probably doesn`t do the sign justice.

    Nice one.

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 11:21

    :lol1: Austin Bedford IS the name of the guy that used to own the garage , he’s about 70, there’s an Austin Healey that plays rugby for England :lol1:

  • Rod Gray

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 12:34

    lol….classic name ๐Ÿ˜€

  • Shane Drew

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 12:58
    quote lasabledps:

    .

    If I may suggest that you ‘Initial cap’ the – Sales – Repairs – MOT Testing of Diesel and Petrol, I think that would be less aggressive than all caps, plus it would make the MOT more prominent as you have done in the first sign.

    I agree with everyone else here Steve, the bottom is the better choice. Mark makes a good point too.

    It would be nice to have some buildings with history over here, other than old jails reminding us of our convict past ๐Ÿ˜•

    Well done,

    Cheers

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 13:09

    Cheers folks
    Nope tried this, the descenders in lower case interfere too much with the text below and make it look untidy.


    Attachments:

  • magpie

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 14:59

    Hi Steve, here’s a very basic suggestion.
    If you introduce a nicer box (than I’ve used here) around that line of text and maybe even make the black text, white or cream.

    Just a thought


    Attachments:

  • Jill Marie Welsh

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 15:06

    That’s the box I was referring to, but on the “specializing” part.
    I like the MOT line all-caps because it acts as an underline to the main copy.
    Still don’t like TELEPHONE tho! ๐Ÿ˜‰
    A lot of people dislike the use of red & black, but it doesn’t bother me.
    Love….Jill

  • Webeasel

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 15:39

    personally guys, I think you are missing the point on this,

    whilst the lower sign looks more in keeping with the building and is more traditional, the owner has a business to run.

    the other sign, whilst not my cup of tea, is more modern and is likely to get the owner more work on newer cars with a greater profit margin.

    The traditional sign is likely to have passers by thinking…

    “old garage, quaint, but are they up to servicing my 2004 reg Audi Diesel?”

    Complementing buildings in signage is great, but at the expense of viable business it means nothing.

    Try to do both…

  • Webeasel

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 16:06

    Had a quick play with this,

    I don’t like white backgrounded signs, prefer a colour

    Needs the phone number on and maybe a tinted version of the road graphic in the background.

    Logos are optional, but recommended

    Maybe don’t put MOT on sign, suggest a separate projecting sign with the official MOT sign on it, its what motorists look for.

    Whilst this maybe not everyones cup of tea, it is more likeley to attract the correct customers for you client?


    Attachments:

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 16:15
    quote Webeasel:

    personally guys, I think you are missing the point on this,

    whilst the lower sign looks more in keeping with the building and is more traditional, the owner has a business to run.

    the other sign, whilst not my cup of tea, is more modern and is likely to get the owner more work on newer cars with a greater profit margin.

    The traditional sign is likely to have passers by thinking…

    “old garage, quaint, but are they up to servicing my 2004 reg Audi Diesel?”

    Complementing buildings in signage is great, but at the expense of viable business it means nothing.

    Try to do both…

    Right maybe I should have explained, this place is an old and very well established business thats been there for years, its just been taken over because Austin has retired at 71, i think they used to work on chariots :lol1: in a small village that is about 2 miles from the main A52 between skeggy and boston, the road that goes past the garage, through the rest of the village to ……………. nowhere :lol1: their trade comes from the locals, the kind of place where you turn up to have your car serviced and end up making tea for yourself and everyone else, he wouldn’t know what to do with a 2004 audi as I doubt very much wether he has the enormously expensive electronic diagnostic gadgetry to plug into the cpu :lol1: gotta disagree with the comment on complementing the build, out here in the sticks its important that signage should complement the environment, putting some ‘orrible stainless steel carbuncle on a 300 yr old building is tasteless and vulgar, but we all get to know our markets, and mines rural not a city, for instance theres a blanket ban on any neon signage throughout the boston borough.

    I’ll have a look at the box thing thanks folks.

  • signworxs

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 16:21

    Tis the one at old leek then steve.

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 16:23
    quote signworxs:

    Bottom Steve, you know it makes sense. Is that the place next to the railway crossings near Old Leek?

    Ooops apologies Paul missed your post, its in Old Leake right past the White Hart towards Commonside , the other side of OLGA just across from Howsams Mill, thats got all the non yellowbellys confused ain’t it? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Customer just called “Can I have 2 of the bottom one?” bonus! originally only doing 1 :lol1:

  • Chris Wool

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 16:29
    quote :

    its in Old Leake right past the White Hart towards Commonside , the other side of OLGA just across from Howsams Mill, thats got all the non yellowbellys confused ain’t it?

    .

    thats well deep into twelve toe country then – ๐Ÿ˜‰

    chris

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 16:34

    ๐Ÿ˜› Thats good coming from a Cornishman, do you lot even speak English, I thought you were nearly Welsh :lol1: (Ducks out the back door to avoid the hail of pointed flaming leeks from the Taff contingent) ๐Ÿ˜‰ :lol1: :lol1:

  • Chris Wool

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 16:55

    born in peterborough only been down here 25 years and another 25 to go of my probation means il never have to go to skeggy again ๐Ÿ˜› ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Webeasel

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 18:59

    Hey WOOOH!!

    only trying to help, new to the forum, but been in sign & print design for a while.

    Still think you have to balance the requirements of succesfully marketing a busineness with effective signage and that of complementing a building?

    Never suggested you have S/S or Neon?

    I REALLY liked the road graphic on your first sign, it SAYS so much more than the other one – only my opinion, but it is YOUR work.

    If I did have a slight criticism, it is that your 2nd sign has too much of a centred approach, what about splitting it somehow?

    for example


    Attachments:

  • Robert Lambie

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 19:47

    based totaly on what the majority have went for i have altered steves design a little were i felt it was conjested.
    as much as i agree “somtimes” signs should fit in with the surroundings. i also agree that with a jiggle about like webeasel has done in his last design can make all the difference. its not traditinal granted but can & does give a more inviting sign, but still keeping with the country feel to it.
    having said that i do feel webeasels design is a little conjested, but hey.. thats just my opinion. doesnt mean im right ๐Ÿ˜‰


    Attachments:

  • Jill Marie Welsh

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 19:55

    OK, now if you made that box RED with cream colored all-caps lettering….
    and spell DIESEL right! hahahahaha
    Love….Jill ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Robert Lambie

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 19:59

    I’m laughing here Jill :lol1: :lol1:
    i actually said to myself.. i better spell flippen diesel right or they will have a Field day with me ๐Ÿ˜ฎ :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

    what did i do? i know i know… wouldn’t be a rob lambie sign if it wasn’t spelled wrong now would it? ๐Ÿ˜‰ :lol1: :lol1: :lol1:

  • Jill Marie Welsh

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 20:01

    Your dyslexia only adds to your charm Rob.
    Hey, at least you have a signature style!
    j. ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Robert Lambie

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 20:16

    Ok jill
    seeing as i have to fix the spelling anyway ๐Ÿ˜‰ and that a after second look i did actualy think the main word in those colours made it look top heavy, i think your suggestion of red border is better. still not sure on the caps though ๐Ÿ˜•
    anyway.. im sure steve will decide whats best after he chucks these ones in the bin ๐Ÿ˜‰ :lol1:


    Attachments:

  • Mark Shipley

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 20:19

    :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

    Nice one Rob, that will keep the spell checkers quiet for a while.

    Mark

  • Jill Marie Welsh

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 21:08

    Just tarted it up in Adobe. Not exactly what fonts I’d use, altho they are Stevens ones.


    Attachments:

  • signworxs

    Member
    10 November 2004 at 23:49

    In reply to webeasle, firstly I like your second design. Knowing the area where Steve is going to put this sign ( I used to live 4 miles north ) marketing is not going to be an issue. As he said in an earlier post the place really is in the middle of nowhere, the new owner will only get the same custom as the old boy which will be the few villages around him. Strange folk the yellow bellies :lol1: once they trade with a place thats it for life they will not go to any body else. The new owner will be assured of years of loyal trading. As I remember Austin used to do a lot farm machinery repairs as well.

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    11 November 2004 at 07:30

    Sorry Webeasel I wasn’t having a go and yup I like your designs too, great for the right customer, but not this bloke, have you seen that film “the wicker man” ?? bit like that round here, ain’t it Paul :lol1:
    Rob ta! for those and the signature Lambie style :lol1: :lol1: think I’ll have a play ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Rod Gray

    Member
    11 November 2004 at 16:37

    Webeasel,

    I like what i see, thanks for taking the time and effort to post your capabilities.

    Hope to see more of your work, keep it coming.

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 11:48

    Finished this today.


    Attachments:

  • Gordon Forbes

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 12:02

    Nice one again Steve

    Goop

  • Rod Gray

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 13:08

    Spot on steve, as usual.

  • Jill Marie Welsh

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 13:19

    I’m glad that you are one of the rare men who LISTEN to advice!
    Looks good Steve.
    Love….Jill

  • Steve Broughton

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 13:21
    quote Jillbeans:

    I’m glad that you are one of the rare men who LISTEN to advice!
    Looks good Steve.
    Love….Jill

    Shhh don’t tell the wife :lol1: thanks Jill ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Carrie Brown

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 13:26

    That looks fantastic, very nice ๐Ÿ˜€

  • Andy Gorman

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 18:29

    Real smart Steve, as usual.

  • Nicola McIntosh

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 20:06

    very nice steve!! ๐Ÿ˜› ๐Ÿ˜›

    Nik

  • Robert Lambie

    Member
    2 December 2004 at 20:22

    Very nice Steve came out wellโ€ฆ nice one. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Constructive criticism:
    I think the bottom line appears congested.
    The overall height of the third line could do with being dropped about half an inch.
    The telephone number could go more to the right, right justifying with the panel on line two.
    The specialists in light commercial could go to the left, left justified with the panel on line two.
    This would create a larger space between both, appearing as two messages rather than one line, at a glance. I know the red dot is there, but i feel it appears as a separator, rather than a decorative dot.

    Just my feelings on the final sign mate, but still a very nice sign indeed.

  • Ramj

    Member
    3 January 2005 at 14:25

    Um, I’m not sure if it’s been mentioned, so am I the only one who think the kerning on the ARW could have been eddited slightly?

    the A and the R look too far apart when it’s compared to the R and W, because the R slants downwards into the W’s slanty thingy (only the best technical terms for me)

    apart from that, the sign looks awesome!. wish I could do things like this.

    btw, is anyone on here actually dyslexic, the best designers I’ve met (Including my graphic design teacher) are dyslexic.

    but it does mean I have to correct mistakes, such as “chiropody and message”

  • Robert Lambie

    Member
    3 January 2005 at 15:05

    dislexik, dislike… dyslexic… yep thats me.. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    i know what you mean about A-R but i dont think its a kerning problem, more the letter shape. even if you decreased kerning the “A” wont close up.. and if you increase the R-W it will look way out im sure ๐Ÿ˜•

  • Ramj

    Member
    3 January 2005 at 15:12

    someone gave a sample earlier on in the thread, where it seemed to be better.

    I’ve always been taught to look out for things like VA or RW LA and things like that, I’m not sure what the design rules applying to these are.

  • Robert Lambie

    Member
    3 January 2005 at 15:20

    you could be right mate, many things can be done to a font/s to make them look better but kerning… increase/decrease the space may/may not work.
    you could simply have larger spaces and it would start to look better but ide think it would appear as 3 seperate letters & the following text too tight in comparison. just my opinion mate, it doesnt mean im right… ๐Ÿ˜‰

Log in to reply.