im maybe not understanding you 100% tim, but …
to "try" explain my own thoughts on it is…
thermal printing is like a dry skin of ink fused onto the surface of the vinyl.
if you have 100% ink coverage you have a dry skin of ink over the surface.
if you laminate that, you now have two layers of vinyl sandwiching a dry skin of ink. there for there is nothing to actually hold both layers of vinyl together if any sort of pulling apart action occurs.
im guessing but i would imagine the metalic inks would have less bite, so to speak, due to whatever extras are in the ink to create the chrome effect.
here is a post i made about 5 years ago on solvent ink. much the same story but thermal, i would be imagine, to have more of these issues than solvent.
http://www.uksignboards.com/viewtopic.php?t=16563
before we had our thermal machine a good few years ago now… we had a loan of a wax resin thermal machine. i remember laminating a print i did on that as a test and it was hopeless… the laminate came away holding the picture on its adhesive side, with nothing left on the actual printed onto film.
same goes for UV Flatbed printed. we spent about £65,000 on a flatbed machine. similar story… i printed onto di-bond one day… print was excellent. came out dry, prefect as could be. walked over and guillotined off the edges of dibond so i had a perfect edge-to-edge print. as i walked away from the gilotine i noticed a little dog-ear on the metal. i picked it away and i was left with a 100% intact photograph made up of dry UV ink.
the dibond was completely clean, bare white. i scrunched the picture up and it broke into a million tiny peaces of dry ink. was weird…
obviously all the above comes down to keying issues of the ink onto the substrate/media…
hope my waffling has maybe helped and i hope some of it is relevant to what your asking. :lol1: