Home Forums Sign Making Discussions General Sign Topics Proposed changes to Town and Country Planning

  • Proposed changes to Town and Country Planning

    Posted by Craig Brown on 27 July 2006 at 11:21

    At one time or another we all need to get planning consent for signage that we erect, you may be interested to read some of the proposed changes that are being put forward by the “Department for Communities and Local Government” to the English Planning regulations. At the moment this document is open to debate but any issues regarding the “Draft Country and Planning regulations” must be lodged by 18th September.

    Text in italic taken from the Department for Communities and Local Government web site.
    Improvements to control outdoor advertisements were announced in June 2000 following the public response to the proposals in the Modernising Planning consultation paper Outdoor Advertisement Control.
    The proposed changes have been incorporated into draft Control of Advertisements Regulations which were sent to all local planning authorities in England, advertisement organisations as well as individuals who expressed interest in responding to this consultation. There is a simultaneous consultation on an associated draft Circular and Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA).
    The Government invites comments on the proposals. Please send your response no later than 18 September 2006.
    Planning System Improvement Division
    Department for Communities and Local Government
    Zone 3/J4
    Eland House
    Bressenden Place
    London SW1E 5DU
    Fax: 0207 944 3919
    Email responses are welcome. If you are replying by email please include the words ‘consultation response’ in the subject or title. These and any queries can be sent to advertsregs@communities.gsi.gov.uk.

    So if you are interested to see what impact the proposed changes could have on the external signage you sell, take a few hours to read through the documents listed below that can be downloaded via http://www.dclg.gov.uk/index.asp?id=1501750

    1. Consultee cover letter – “Draft Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) (England) Regulations 2006 and Draft Circular” – 3 pages
    2. “Draft Government Circular: Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 2006” – 68 pages
    3. “Partial Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA)” – 9 pages
    4. “Statutory Instruments – Town and Country Planning, England” – 50 pages

    I’ll post back once I’ve piled through all the documents, but would be interested to hear others thoughts and concerns (if you have any).

    Regards Craig B

    Pauly replied 19 years, 5 months ago 5 Members · 8 Replies
  • 8 Replies
  • Shane Drew

    Member
    27 July 2006 at 12:15

    If governments have anything to do with signage mate, you can bet on two things.

    1.. It will be draconian in its implementation

    and 2… It will involve higher fees and charges in the application process (read: Taxes).

    Our Queensland Labor State government have implemented new changes here for sign shops last year.

    They have made it compulsary to have a restricted builders license if erecting a sign over 3 metres from the ground, or erecting a sign that requires footings.

    The restricted builders license is a 4 year community college course, and very expensive, both in dollars and time.

    I heard the other day that the owner of the business must have a license, not just an employee. I’m not sure if that is correct though.

    If you don’t have a license, you must get a licensed builder to install the sign on your behalf. They charge for this of course.

    Even if you have a structual engineer signature to sign off on the sign, this costs me $600 a signature, you still need a builder to sign off also. Most builders around here charge $120 per signature. Of course, if anything is wrong, they cop the blame.

    To be honest I’ve lost track of the regulations now, I threw my hands up in disgust.

    Every other state here (all Labor ) are now following suit.

    Our sign association had a board of elected members, all owners of large sign shops. I think they didn’t fight the government as they saw it as a good opportunity to get rid of small one man bands like me who are a thorn in their side. Our AGM at the time was pretty firey, but the board opened the Bar and most of the guys were more interested in a beer than the results of the vote.

    Long term sign shops were told that we would automatically get a license if we had been in the business longer than 10 years. When it came to the legislation going through parliment tho, the goverment recinded that offer.

    All it has done is forced a lot of small sign shops out of that area of the market, leaving the big boys with less opposition. I know of a few that have closed their doors, or retired early. Some really good operators too.

    The Queensland sign association had their AGM tonight, but I had to work, so I’m not sure of the latest outcome, but rest assured, anytime the government gets involved in any industry, it will be driven by financial reasons more than anything else.

    If I were you guys and girls, I’d take an interest in anything that involves your livelyhood.

    I look forward to your appraisal of the paperwork Craig.

  • Craig Brown

    Member
    27 July 2006 at 12:28

    Cheers Shane – I’m only 30 pages in and my head already hurts. Doesn’t sound to great in your neck of the woods if it’s putting people out of business.

    Give me a couple of days and I’ll see what bits I can come back on…

    all the best Craig B

  • Phill Fenton

    Member
    27 July 2006 at 13:02

    I think most small sign businesses leave it to the customer to obtain planning permission. Our local planning office appears to make up their own rules as they go along – they are certainly not very consistent. How planners ever gave planning permision for advertisements to be placed on main road roundabouts I don’t know 🙄 (Maybe it’s because the local council get a large revenue from these adverts). Scotland will have it’s own sets of rules and regulations – but our Scottish parliament are too busy meddling in the human rights of smokers to worry too much about signs just now.

    (That’s a point – I wonder if all the no smoking stuff decided by the Scottish parliament is in fact illegal due to breaches in individual Human rights – If a prisoner can sue because he has to use a "potty" – why shouldn’t a smoker sue about the indignity of having to stand out in the wind and rain if he wants a smoke)

  • John Stevenson

    Member
    27 July 2006 at 13:22

    Hey Phil

    The no-smoking regulations are possibly the only good thing the Scottish parliament has achieved. I was in the south of England last weekend and It felt really bad to be in buildings where people were smoking.

    I had almost forgotten how horrible it is to have my hair and clothes polluted by other peoples exhalations.

    Thankfully England is going to be set free from all that soon.

    Long live fresh air!

    John

  • Craig Brown

    Member
    27 July 2006 at 13:24

    Oh my god a smoking debate, better get the hard hats 😉

  • Shane Drew

    Member
    28 July 2006 at 10:56
    quote CABROWN:

    Oh my god a smoking debate, better get the hard hats 😉

    :rofl:

    Don’t get me started on a smoking debate :you: :lol1: I’m an avid no smoking fan, and I’m a shrinking violet compared to my dad :angry: , and he is shy and timid compared to my mum. :nagnag: :lol1: :lol1:

  • Shane Drew

    Member
    28 July 2006 at 12:55

    on the subject of smoking, this was in our weekend paper….

    LESS than a week after Queensland’s new anti-smoking laws came into force, a bar attendant in a suburban Brisbane hotel has been sacked for smoking on the premises. She’d been smoking marijuana in the pub’s toilet for the disabled. The offender wasn’t caught red handed – she carelessly left her bong and a cigarette lighter engraved with her name in the toilet.

  • Pauly

    Member
    2 August 2006 at 07:20

    God bless the stoners…………… mwah ha ha ha ha

Log in to reply.